DocArzt and Friends Logo

Marc Oromaner’s Lost In Myth: “Follow the Leader”-Can Changing One Moment Change Everything?

By docarzt,

  Filed under: Lost In Myth
  Comments: 18

3tunnelswimHave you ever wondered what would happen if you could go back to a particular moment of your life and do something differently? What if you hadn’t taken a job you’d accepted, married someone you’d broken up with, said “no” when you’d previously said yes…or vice-versa? What if we were all allowed one do-over?  Would your life be completely different than it is now, or would events have conspired to put you in pretty much the same place? By continuing to explore the concept of the variable, “Follow the Leader” brings up these very same questions, and if you’ve been paying attention, it’s already given us the answers.

In the 1998 film Sliding Doors, Gwyneth Paltrow’s character splits in two different directions all depending on whether she manages to catch a train.  Interestingly, the two realities never coalesce. In fact, as the story progresses, the separate versions of her life split further and further apart, and end up in two entirely different places. While I enjoyed the movie and the perspective it brought up, to be honest, it didn’t sit entirely right with me. Is life really just a collection of random events with an infinite number of pathways all dependent on an infinite number of decisions we make at any given moment? Or, is there a general path that life wants us to take, and when we drift, it nudges us back in the general direction we’re meant to go? I1sliding_doors prefer the latter explanation, if for no other reason than it is much more forgiving than the former. It gives me comfort to believe that one little mistake is unlikely to mess up my entire life, and if it does, the mistake is unavoidable. It also gives me comfort to think that we are being guided toward some ultimate purpose.

This fate versus free will question has been one of the major themes of Lost and has really come to a head in the last couple of episodes. And despite indications to the contrary, it has already given us its answer-fate wins. Whether that perspective allows for some freedom of choice wiggle room (aligning with my own beliefs) remains to be seen, but the show has already indicated to us that fate will win out in the end, and whatever happened, will happen. In other words, Faraday was right to begin with and his newer “variable” theory is not. How do I know? Well, for starters, he’s dead.

Faraday went to the Others camp in hopes of changing what had happened. Unfortunately, fate wouldn’t let him. If this were any other show, that would be the end of it. Since this is Lost however, there are a million different ways his plan can still take effect: he can be brought to the temple and reincarnated, the smoke monster can free him temporarily from the afterworld or duplicate his likeness, his thoughts can be channeled via Miles, he can be rescued through time travel, or, Jack can be inspired to take his message to heart and continue Faraday’s plan on his own. While I won’t be surprised if any of these methods lead to Jack and company setting off Jughead, I can tell you it will not make a lick of difference for the end result. As many Lost fans have gathered, if anything, Jughead is more likely to cause the incident that led to the current sequence of events than stop it. Even if it doesn’t, even if the explosion of a hydrogen bomb manages to somehow defy physics by, in Faraday’s own bizarre words, “destroy the energy” (most physicists agree that energy cannot be created or destroyed), it will still amount to no change.

Think about it. If Jack manages to set off the bomb and it prevents the incident so that the Swan station numbers never have to be pressed, then Desmond can’t inadvertently cause 815 to crash. That means 815 lands but Jack and the gang will never be sent back to the island to prevent the incident that caused it to crash. I can picture all the 815ers carrying about their lives in 2004, when suddenly there is a ripple and all these weird things start to happen sort of like in the Ray Bradbury story, “A Sound of Thunder.” Only here, Jack’s actions will cancel 2movieposterthemselves out. So, there will eventually be more ripples causing Jack and company to come back to the island in 1977 to be given another chance. Assuming he doesn’t remember having done so already, Jack may prevent the incident again. If so, the same thing will happen-all the 815ers will be stuck in a loop until the incident is allowed to occur. This could go on and on until, perhaps, Jack has a déjà vu and gets a sense that he keeps doing the same thing again and again. He may still do it anyway, until the déjà vu gets stronger and stronger, acting like feedback on itself. I don’t know about you, but whenever I get déjà vu, it’s usually a déjà vu of my remembering something where I also had déjà vu. It’s because an event is continually repeating, including, my remembering that the event has already happened.

There was actually a Star Trek: The Next Generation episode titled “Cause and Effect” that covered this very theme. In it, the Enterprise is caught in a time rift and the crew keeps making the same choice to get out of it. The ship, along with the crew, are all destroyed but then loop back to the same moment where they made the wrong decision. Eventually, the android character, Data, notices a strange sequence of numbers in the cards he’s holding during a game of poker that soon show up everywhere. Data comes to believe that it’s his subconscious talking to him from one of the previous loops. Repeating numbers? Perhaps we aren’t seeing the first time the Losties have gone through this series of events, perhaps it has been going on for an eternity and the universe, aka, the island is giving them clues on how to get out of it and get time flowing again. Maybe this loop extends further back than the 815 crash and explains why all the Losties are connected-the universe is conspiring to bring everyone together so that things can happen as they are meant to.  Interestingly, this Star Trek TNG episode also brings up themes of mysterious whispers and characters getting headaches, just like Lost.

It truly is amazing what messages mythically-themed stories-and Lost in particular-are sending us. If you think about it, Lost can be teaching us exactly how the world works-even if it’s only subconsciously. In fact, “Follow the Leader” brought up this very point throughout the episode, although, even this was sent subconsciously. As I mention in The Myth of Lost, “mythologically speaking, being underwater (especially in the ocean) is symbolic of dreams and the subconscious. That’s why the planet Neptune-named after the Roman god of the sea-represents our dreams and subconscious in astrology.” In fact, it’s not just being underwater-being underground also represents the subconscious.

In “Follow the Leader” we witness people swimming underwater to reach underground tunnels. There, they find the underground bomb that could set off this loop. We also see the love triangle of Sawyer/Kate/Juliet (or “Skatiet”) head underwater in a submarine (water also represents love and emotion). Since the sub passengers have not been knocked out for the journey, as is the custom, I would actually be very surprised if they are able to make it back to the mainland. Not just because it would mess with my main Lost theory, but also because it sort of messes with the mythology of the show. Why did they always have to be knocked out before if it was never necessary? Yet, I digress. The point is that all these underwater and underground scenes are a heads-up from the shamanistic powers of the writers that the story is giving our subconscious a juicy download about how the world really works. Will the variable win out over the constant? I say no, and here’s one last reason why: Miles.

Miles never grew up on the island. His father, Dr. Chang, practically forced them to leave. The reason Dr. Chang did this, we eventually learn, was so that his family would be safe from the incident. And the reason he knew about the incident was because Miles, Faraday, and inadvertently Hurley, convinced him that they were from the future. So, the effects of Jack and the gang’s time traveling have led to results that can already be witnessed, namely, Miles having been taken from the island as a baby. Even if there was no evidence though, Jack cannot prevent the incident from happening because the effects of this action are what enable him to do so. In other words, this isn’t just a paradox, it’s a looping paradox where the results are needed to create those results. The closest Jack can come to making a change, is to set off some massive looping feedback. Perhaps, this is what the incident is-and it will continue until Jack loops to a time where he does not set off the bomb. It is possible that Jack prevents the incident, or gets everyone killed, and this may be how the episode ends. But this result will 4galagasubeventually be rendered moot because whether Jack is dead or stops the incident, he cannot come back to the island to cause this very result. So, it must loop back again.

To bring this column full circle, if you could get a redo for a certain decision you made in your life, where would you be? I believe you would be in pretty much the same place right now. You are in the career you are meant to be in-even if you hate it and should probably leave it for something else. You are in the relationship you are meant to be in-even if it is doomed to failure. It’s all learning lessons designed to help us experience ourselves in certain ways we are meant to experience. We have freedom of choice when it comes to the details. But ultimately, life will steer you on the course you are meant to go. It will give you the challenges you are meant to overcome. And it will keep doing so until you either overcome them-or don’t. Chances are though, you’ll get to play again in your next life. If you didn’t succeed, you’ll be given a similar set of circumstances once again. And if you do succeed, you’ll come back at a more advanced level with harder challenges.

I think this is the ultimate message of Lost that we just might get to see during “The Incident” or not until a year from now. If it’s the latter, do you have the patience to wait? If not, don’t worry. This game of life is impossible to lose.  If you don’t get it in this lifetime, you’ll get it in the next. And we’ll all be there to help.

Marc Oromaner is a New York City writer whose book, The Myth of Lost offers a simple solution to Lost and uncovers its hidden insight into the mysteries of life. He can be contacted in the discussion section of The Myth of Lost Facebook page.

The Myth of Lost is available on Amazon and

  • Chaz E.

    Simply outstanding. Well written article!

  • rivum

    yes, great article. i like your tie in to the star trek episode.
    i’m off to researcht that now.

  • bonosk

    Great article; thank you! I like your comparison to “Cause and Effect,” and I submit another Star Trek TNG show, “Tapestry,” which paints a more bleak picture of how a life can change based on one decision. But unlike the characters on LOST, Picard could see how his life was altered by that decision. Jack cannot (yet) see a reality when 815 didn’t crash, and I think he must ultimately come to understand the importance of the experiences on the island and over the past 3 years (both joyful and painful, including the deaths of companions).

  • Tan Wang

    And then Leslie Arzt blew up because he finally got to hang with the cool people.

  • King Solomon, the second wisest human being in history disagrees with you.
    (Ecclesiastes 9:11)

    • Ecclesiastes 9:11 (King James Version)

      “I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.”

      I actually agree with that statement. From who’s perspective is the chance happening? If whatever happened, happened, but you don’t know what happened, then it appears to be chance from your point of view. A programmer knows the way a video game can go, but the video game character doesn’t.

      I’m guessing that’s your point (and please correct me if I missed it) but I actually interpret this passage a bit differently. I think it says that not all good people who work hard will be rewarded even if they deserve to be. That there is an unpredictability to life. Again, I agree. But viewing it from the big picture, I would say that it’s already fated as to whether the strong will win that battle or the swift will win a race, but it’s all chance to them.

      BTW, completely unrelated, but would you mind removing the “Lost in Myth” tag from your last column (the Donovan one)? I use it to put all the “Lost in Myth” columns under one heading. If you click on it, you’ll see that they are all there. Feel free to use “Lost Mythos” or “mythology” or whatever else, but that tag was created just for the columns. Thanks.

      • I agree that chance and inevitability (I avoid supernatural words such as fate and destiny) are NOT mutually exclusive, but are a matter of perspective. However, since the perspective of inevitability is one of a time traveler, and since in the real world, there are no time travelers, I would have to say that free will trumps fate/destiny.

        I could go all biblical on this subject by pointing out that God is the only individual that is privy to knowledge of the future, and he created us with free will, thus further indicating that free will trumps destiny, but this is not the place for such a discussion. If you are game, my email address is easy to figure out, as I make constant use of my username in everything and am a huge fan of google.

        P.S. I will gladly fix the Donovan post. I didn’t know that tag was exclusive. My apologies.

        • Perhaps such a discussion would be better off in a forum where others could add to it if they wanted. If you’re interested, feel free to start a topic on “The Myth of Lost” Facebook page in the discussion section. Fate (inevitability) vs Freewill would do.

          Here is the link:

          Thanks for removing the tag from your post. No worries.

  • Libby’s Ghost

    Insightful article, thanks! Regarding your “Cause and Effect” Star Trek TNG theory: I’ve had a feeling ever since the end of season 3 – the part where Naomi is on the beach about to radio the freighter (before Locke knifes her to death) – that we were in some sort of time loop. Or if not a “time loop”, then at least that scene was happening for the second time. I’d have to go back and re-watch it to be 100% sure, but there is a part in there where Jack smiles knowingly at Kate, and says something to the effect of “you ready to do this again?”, and she winks back (again in a knowing way – as if they’ve been thru this before). Jack probably doesn’t overtly say “again”, but you get that “Groundhog Day” feeling that this isn’t the first time they’ve played out this scene, and that this time, they’re trying to get it right. Again, I could be totally off base with this, but that scene has always stuck with me, and I’d be tickled if I were right on this.

  • Dharma77

    Great article, made me think very deeply. Man, Lost is deeeeep!

  • Hello there, simply turned into aware of your blog thru Google, and found that it is really informative. I?m gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. A lot of other folks will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  • I precisely had to say thanks once again. I do not know the things that I might have undertaken in the absence of these tricks revealed by you regarding such concern. Certainly was an absolute frustrating matter in my view, nevertheless looking at your specialised style you treated that took me to jump with joy. Now i’m grateful for the service as well as hope you comprehend what a great job your are undertaking teaching many people through the use of your webblog. I am sure you haven’t come across any of us.

  • Wonderful, totally agree with you

  • What i don’t realize is in truth how you are now not really a lot more neatly-liked than you might be now. You are so intelligent.